Psalms 74:1-23 - Exposition

In favour of the first is the ascription of the psalm in the "title" to Asaph. But all other considerations are against it. There is no evidence that Shishak ever entered Jerusalem. He certainly did not break down the carved work of the temple, or set the temple on fire, much less "cast it down to the ground." His invasion was a mere raid, and Rehoboam seems to have bought his retreat by the sacrifice of the temple treasury ( 2 Kings 14:25-28 ; 2 Chronicles 12:2-12 ). The circumstances described in the psalm are also unsuitable to the reign of Judas Maccabaeus, in whose time the temple suffered desecration at the hands of the Syrians, but was not seriously damaged, much less demolished. Thus the only date suitable for the composition of the psalm is that immediately following the capture of the city under Nebuchadnezzar. We must explain the "title" by the consideration that Asaph, like Jeduthun and Heman, became a tribe name, attaching to all the descendants of the original Asaph, and was equivalent to "sou of Asaph" (see Ezra 2:41 ; Ezra 3:10 ; Nehemiah 7:44 ; Nehemiah 11:22 ).

The psalm consists of three portions:

1. A complaint to God, including a description of all the horrors of the situation ( Psalms 74:1-11 ).

2. An enumeration of God's mercies in the olden time, as a foundation for hope that he will yet rescue Israel ( Psalms 74:12-17 ).

3. An earnest prayer for relief and restoration, and the re-establishment of the covenant ( Psalms 74:18-23 ).