Matthew 21:23-27 - Homilies By W.f. Adeney

Question met by question.

Perhaps we shall best gather up the lessons of this incident if we look first at the form it assumed, then at the underlying substance.

I. THE FORM .

1 . The question of the rulers.

2 . The counter question of Christ. He postpones his reply to a question he desires to have answered by the rulers.

II. THE SUBSTANCE . That was indeed an important question which the rulers put to Christ. If it were asked humbly and sincerely, it might be regarded as most just and reasonable. When it is so asked, Christ does answer it. Indeed, if the rulers had not been blind, they would have found a twofold reply close at hand. Christ justifies and confirms his claims:

1 . By the authority of conscience. When he startled the people in the temple by an unwonted exercise of authority, they submitted without an attempt at resistance, because their consciences confirmed his action. Christ speaks to the conscience, and the conscience echoes what he says.

2 . By the authority of knowledge. Who are the authoritative teachers? Surely the only teachers who can speak to us with authority are those who know the subjects they undertake to teach. Jesus "spoke with authority" ( Matthew 7:29 ), because he spoke out of knowledge. There was a self-evidencing truthfulness and clearness of vision in him.

3 . By the authority of God. The rulers could not see this. If their blindness had not been morally culpable, they would have been excused for rejecting the claims of Christ, because those claims were so great that no mere man could have a right to put them forth. When we perceive the Divine nature of Christ, all his words and deeds are justified, and his authority comes upon us with more than kingly power.—W.F.A.